Koinonia House Video Reponse Is Huge

Yesterdays video posted by Koinonia House regarding the Revelation 12 Sign has generated quite the buzz!  As of the writing of this, their YouTube page had 656 comments on the subject and Facebook post had 272 comments.  Our posts here on this website and FB combined for another 121 comments as well!  I am sure there are many many more discussions going on around the internet.  The good news is that Koinonia House has responded and will be interviewing Scottie Clarke on the matter in the near future.  This is excellent news!  I was quite let down by the poor nature of their video which left out much information and extremely relevant scripture passages, but the fact that they are willing to bring Scott on and allow him to respond in person shows great humility. I am looking forward to this event and according to Scott they will be doing a video interview tomorrow and Ron assured him that he would give Scott "run of the floor" without a "debunking agenda".  Here is there original interaction from the comments section on YouTube.

If you haven't watched the video yet, or are behind on the comments, here is the link...
https://rev12daily.blogspot.com/2017/07/koinonia-house-addresses-revelation-12.html

As for my main objections to Ron's video, they were this: 
He presented a very one-sided argument under the guise of presenting all the information and letting the viewer decided for themselves.  Here is a sample of the info that was left out:

• Gen 1:14 - God made the stars for Signs
• Rev 2:26-27 - The Church will rule with a Rod of Iron as well
• Micah 5:2-4 - Woman in labor sign is key indicator of start of new dispensation
• Amos 5:8, Job 9:9, Job 38:32-33 - Bible lists Constellations and God takes credit for them
• He also failed to mention the 9+ month retrograde loop of Jupiter in the "midsection" of the woman.
• Claimed that Stellarium can't be trusted and that we could not know how to use it properly since we are not professional astronomers.
• Failed to mention the Biblical precedence for Heavenly Signs such as the Magi at Christ's birth.
• He said nothing of any importance happened on 12-23-16 (9 months out from sign), but what about this unprecedented event directly related to Israel?
• He claimed studying this is Astrology.
• He claimed that all constellation lines had to be identical in order to ever use them.
• He did not mention any of the collaborating signs of the times that also converge on the this time period.
• Lastly, he never even mentioned that Chuck Missler himself taught on multiple occasions the Child from Rev 12:5 could be the Church, and that the passage could be describing the Rapture!

There are other things I could get into but most of those are addressed in the comments section of yesterdays post. Ron was nice enough in the video and I appreciate him bringing attention to the topic.  I highly respect their ministry and to see how little relevant info was brought to light only gives me confidence that we are on the right track.  Reading the comments from everyone has been a joy, and I am happy to say I have seen very few "personal attacks" and a much more reasoned and Biblical response to this.

Steve Sewell also posted a video responding to this latest video.  It is very straightforward and worth listening to as I think he makes a couple interesting points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxSYWuWExUg

Gary from Unsealed.org also just put up an article in response to this. Here is the link:
Why The Revelation 12 Sign Can't Be Debunked